It's
2009--do you know where your KM is? Okay, so that was mostly just a lame attempt
to say "Happy New Year!" to everyone. But really, where are your knowledge management efforts
getting you? If it were up to me, KM would look and feel much like the social
communities that we've modeled many knowledge-sharing practices after. Here's
an example that I think embodies everything I'm trying to convey: It's the
global positioning satellite receiver (or GPSr) community.
Results tagged “KMfuture” from KM Edge: Where the best in Knowledge Management come together

On behalf of everyone at APQC, I'd like to wish you a happy 2009! I hope
you've all had a relaxing, enjoyable holiday season and are feeling rested and
ready for the year ahead.
As some of you may remember, APQC's December KM community call focused on
the 2008 Global Most Admired Knowledge Enterprises (MAKE) study, conducted by Teleos in association
with The KNOW Network. We were joined by special guest presenter Rory Chase, managing director of Teleos, who provided
an overview of the award's history and announced the 2008 global winners. The call also included presentations by representatives
from four of the 20 global winners: Carla O'Dell from APQC, Tom Barfield from
Accenture, Dan
Nerison from Fluor, and Susan Rosenbaum from Schlumberger.
With so much great material to cover, our presenters weren't able to
answer all of your questions during the presentation. However, as we promised
at the end of the call, we've compiled your questions and are posting the
presenters' responses below. Thank you to everyone who participated in the call,
and a special thank you to our presenters who took time out of the busy holiday
season to write such thoughtful replies. We hope you find the answers helpful
as you pursue your KM goals for the new year.
How will the current economic crisis affect 2009 knowledge management budgets and priorities? Until now, no one has had the answer to this question. On November 20, APQC's KM community came together during its monthly call to fill the void. We anonymously polled everyone on the call (more than 80 people with every imaginable KM title) about how the economy is impacting their KM budgets and objectives for 2009. Here's what we found.
Several months ago, I blogged about some KM "standards"--taxonomy, lessons learned, using collaboration spaces, and so on--that I thought would be old news by now for most organizations. What made me realize that these issues hadn't gone away was the fact that we were getting so many requests for help--both from organizations steeped in KM and those new to it. During one of my rare appearances in the office this week, I ran into one of my favorite Millennial colleagues, and our discussion led me to think that some other long-standing beliefs (or maybe myths in this case) are still running rampant out there.
I recently had the privilege of speaking at the
second annual Southern California KM Forum. I met many great people there and
learned a lot about their various KM programs and activities. One presentation
in particular sticks out in my mind. Given by Charlotte Linde from the
KMWorld is an annual event
that I always enjoy attending. No, not because
What is different from 2007 is the sense of
what's hot, if that's an appropriate term to use in this area we call KM. (If
you're wondering why I would even ask that question, note that "Is KM dead?"
was also asked at the conference.) What I'm feeling here--or not feeling to be
more precise--is the overwhelming number of sessions devoted to the topic of Web
2.0 social networking applications. To be sure, there are some breakouts
devoted to connectivity via social tools, but overall, there seems to be more
balance between technology and "softer" topics this year. Practical advice such
as how to gain sponsorship, real world case studies, and techniques for
improved knowledge sharing seem to be just as prevalent topics.
Victor Newman, formerly of Pfizer, had some interesting things to say. He distinguishes two kinds of KM. One is KM related to supporting the company's existing strategy. The other is KM related to supporting the strategy that the company will need to survive in tomorrow's world. His assumption is that most companies are dying in the sense that the strategies they are currently pursuing will not provide long-term survival, a premise supported by the fact that roughly half of the Fortune 1000 companies of 20 years ago no longer exist. And all the signs are that the death rate is accelerating.
Recent Comments