What Do a Tulip and $700 Billion Have in Common?

Comments (0)
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for carlaIcon.png

I was asked last week, "Is the current subprime credit mess evidence of a massive knowledge-sharing failure?" "Would better knowledge management have helped?"

My answer to both questions was "no". This collapse isn't a failure of knowledge to flow or best practices to transfer.  Knowledge of investment "opportunities" and cheap credit flowed like wine. Credit (the plastic version) or buying a piece of the American dream (the condo version) was easy; lenders could offload debt to others, get their money, and do it all over again.  Those "best practices" transferred quickly.  Shareholders--people like you and me-- rewarded the companies making the biggest short-term profits by buying their stock and firing the CEOs who didn't go along.

So what do a tulip and $700 billion (the possible price tag of our current predicament) have in common? They are both evidence of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds and the triumph of human yearning over logic, knowledge, or wisdom. For a few months in Amsterdam in 1637, a tulip--or, more accurately,  shares in the possible characteristics of a single future tulip--sold for almost half a million in today's dollars. Thousands of people, from shopkeepers to artists, were speculating in tulip futures.  When someone finally called the contract, the house of cards (flowers?) came crashing down, and "tulipmania" joined the economists' lexicon to describe the boom and bust cycles built on hope and uncontrolled market forces.  Sound familiar?

The risks of reliance on borrowed money and a future that assumes an unlimited market and rising prices isn't a closely held secret.  Gary Schilling, an economist who serves on the APQC board of directors, has been telling people for years that the real estate bubble would burst sooner or later. Other voices were just as urgent, but it didn't stop the cycle. This was not a knowledge problem.

So, even if this wasn't a failure of knowledge management, what can we learn?

First, there will be lessons learned, and they will take the form of regulations and new "best practices." (We transform painful lessons learned into standard operating procedure all the time in our organizations.) As a result, this particular bubble may never happen again. But another one will.  Moral: Codified knowledge can never fully replace wisdom and experience.  Live through one burst bubble and you are less likely to fall for it disguised.  

Second, the Siren song of riches and the desire to not be left out outweigh logic and good sense some of the time.  Smart people make bad decisions. Emotion trumps logic. Remember that the next time you introduce a new KM program. 

If you find yourself with time on your hands in the coming weeks (I hope not) and would like to explore the human psychology of crazes, check out Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackay. Michael Pollan's chapter on the tulip craze in The Botany of Desire  is a page-turner.  For a short history about other crazes and their aftermath--and possibly this one--see http://www.investopedia.com/features/crashes/crashes2.asp.

Leave a comment